<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dirty Tricks and How To Avoid Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/deficiency-judgment-dirty-tricks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/deficiency-judgment-dirty-tricks</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/deficiency-judgment-dirty-tricks#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/?p=1546#comment-810</guid>
		<description>We had been told that lenders were going after the borrowers for the deficiency. In California, a more exact example would be, a note balance of 400k, yet it appraises for 175!!!! More than half--- attorneys will never be out of work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had been told that lenders were going after the borrowers for the deficiency. In California, a more exact example would be, a note balance of 400k, yet it appraises for 175!!!! More than half&#8212; attorneys will never be out of work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

