<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Produce the Note Campaign Produces Uncertainty for You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/produce-the-note-campaign-produces-uncertainty-for-you/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/produce-the-note-campaign-produces-uncertainty-for-you</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tammy B</title>
		<link>http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/produce-the-note-campaign-produces-uncertainty-for-you#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/?p=1786#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>Why should this be any different than say, selling a car?  When a car is sold to someone else, the title must be legally transferred. If someone said they &#039;own&#039; that car, they would be required to produce proof that it actually belongs to them. You might pay the insurance, repairs and heck maybe even the car payment.. but it isn&#039;t YOURS unless you can produce the proof.  Why should this situation be any different?  Without proof, this car (our house) could belong to anyone. Shouldn&#039;t the Borrower know who they are buying it from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should this be any different than say, selling a car?  When a car is sold to someone else, the title must be legally transferred. If someone said they &#8216;own&#8217; that car, they would be required to produce proof that it actually belongs to them. You might pay the insurance, repairs and heck maybe even the car payment.. but it isn&#8217;t YOURS unless you can produce the proof.  Why should this situation be any different?  Without proof, this car (our house) could belong to anyone. Shouldn&#8217;t the Borrower know who they are buying it from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisamarie</title>
		<link>http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/produce-the-note-campaign-produces-uncertainty-for-you#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>lisamarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/?p=1786#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>If it doesn&#039;t work-it should. Bottom line is, these lenders took your mortgage and turned it into a financial swapping and trading tool. They took risk  and cut corners hoping to get rich quick off all the peoples homes. Then it got sloppy and sour. Now they don&#039;t know whats what and when asked to prove standing in court, they can&#039;t. That&#039;s fraud upon the court. Saying you have something you don&#039;t. Saying you have skin in the game when you don&#039;t. Everybody needs to stop acting like the poor mortgage companies may lose their money. They never had it to lose. Investors are the losers. Only they can&#039;t keep track of them either. I feel if your mortgage fell into one of these gambling pools  (without your permission I might add)and nobody can prove ownership of your note or mortgage, who do you owe? Whose fault is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it doesn&#8217;t work-it should. Bottom line is, these lenders took your mortgage and turned it into a financial swapping and trading tool. They took risk  and cut corners hoping to get rich quick off all the peoples homes. Then it got sloppy and sour. Now they don&#8217;t know whats what and when asked to prove standing in court, they can&#8217;t. That&#8217;s fraud upon the court. Saying you have something you don&#8217;t. Saying you have skin in the game when you don&#8217;t. Everybody needs to stop acting like the poor mortgage companies may lose their money. They never had it to lose. Investors are the losers. Only they can&#8217;t keep track of them either. I feel if your mortgage fell into one of these gambling pools  (without your permission I might add)and nobody can prove ownership of your note or mortgage, who do you owe? Whose fault is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Produce the note may not work in non-judicial foreclosures - Loans, Debt &#38; Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/produce-the-note-campaign-produces-uncertainty-for-you#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Produce the note may not work in non-judicial foreclosures - Loans, Debt &#38; Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinforeclosure.com/?p=1786#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>[...] Produce the note may not work in non-judicial foreclosures        Wasn&#039;t sure if any one else had heard of this, but the &quot;produce the note&quot; tactic that many are doing or talking about, where the lender is forced to produce the original note on the home or the foreclosure stops, may not work in a non-judicial foreclosure. I&#039;m providing a link below that states that most of those successful were in states like Florida and Ohio, where all of the foreclosures are judicial, and that the very concept of the trustee sale allows them to do so with out needing the note. Is there anyone on here that has successfully fought of the lender in a NON-judicial foreclosure using this tactic.   Produce the Note Doesn&#039;t Work Anymore &#124; Truth in Foreclosure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Produce the note may not work in non-judicial foreclosures        Wasn&#39;t sure if any one else had heard of this, but the &quot;produce the note&quot; tactic that many are doing or talking about, where the lender is forced to produce the original note on the home or the foreclosure stops, may not work in a non-judicial foreclosure. I&#39;m providing a link below that states that most of those successful were in states like Florida and Ohio, where all of the foreclosures are judicial, and that the very concept of the trustee sale allows them to do so with out needing the note. Is there anyone on here that has successfully fought of the lender in a NON-judicial foreclosure using this tactic.   Produce the Note Doesn&#39;t Work Anymore | Truth in Foreclosure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

